首页> 外文OA文献 >A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy and sertraline versus a wait-list control group for anxiety disorders in older adults.
【2h】

A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy and sertraline versus a wait-list control group for anxiety disorders in older adults.

机译:一项针对认知行为疗法和舍曲林与等待组对照组的焦虑症有效性的随机对照试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: This study is the first to investigate the relative effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) compared with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI; sertraline) in a randomized, controlled trial on the treatment of anxiety disorders in older adults. Method: Eighty-four patients 60 years of age and over with a principal diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, or social phobia were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: 15 sessions of CBT, pharmacologie treatment with an SSRI (sertraline; maximum dosage 150 mg), or a waitlist control group. Participants completed measures of primary outcome (anxiety) and coexistent worry and depressive symptoms at baseline, posttreatment, and at three-month follow up. Results: Attrition rates were high in both treatment groups. Consequently, findings are based on a relatively small sample of completers (N = 52). Although both CBT and sertraline led to significant improvement in anxiety, worry, and depressive symptoms both at posttreatment and at three-month follow up, sertraline showed superior results on worry symptoms. Effect size estimates for CBT were in the small to medium range both at posttreatment (mean d = 0.42) and at three-month follow up (mean d= 0.35), whereas effect sizes for sertraline fell into the large range (posttreatment mean d = 0.94 and three-month follow up mean d = 1.02). The waitlist condition showed virtually no effects (posttreatment mean d = .03). Conclusions: Our findings strongly suggest that the pharmacologie treatment of late-life anxiety with SSRIs has not been given the proper attention in research to date. © 2006 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.
机译:目的:这项研究是首次在一项随机对照试验中研究认知行为疗法(CBT)与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI;舍曲林)相比的相对有效性,该疗法用于治疗老年人焦虑症。方法:将主要诊断为广泛性焦虑症,恐慌症,广场恐惧症或社交恐惧症的60岁及以上的84位患者随机分配至以下三种情况之一:15次CBT,SSRI药物治疗;最大剂量150毫克)或候补对照组。在基线,治疗后和三个月的随访中,参与者完成了主要结局(焦虑)以及并存的忧虑和抑郁症状的测量。结果:两个治疗组的损耗率均很高。因此,发现是基于相对较小的完成者样本(N = 52)。尽管CBT和舍曲林均在治疗后和三个月随访中均显着改善了焦虑,忧虑和抑郁症状,但舍曲林在担忧症状方面显示出优异的疗效。在治疗后(平均d = 0.42)和三个月随访中(平均d = 0.35),CBT的效应量估计值均处于中小范围,而舍曲林的效应量估计值则处于较大范围(治疗后均值d = 0.94和3个月的随访平均值d = 1.02)。候补条件几乎没有影响(后处理平均值d = .03)。结论:我们的发现强烈表明,迄今为止,SSRIs药物治疗晚期焦虑症尚未得到应有的重视。 ©2006美国老年精神病学协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号